In Re American International Group, Inc., Consolidated Derivative Litigation;  American International Group, Inc. v. Greenberg, Del. Ch., No. 769-VCS (June 17, 2009), read opinion here.

A recent prior decision by the Chancery Court in this case was highlighted here.  That decision  was over 100-pages long. So by comparison, this 40-page decision might be considered relatively

SinoMab BioScience Limited v. Immunomedics, Inc., No. 2471-VCS (Del. Ch., June 16, 2009), read opinion here.

Overview

This 50-page Chancery Court decision addresses in great detail the intellectual property rights involved in patent disputes between a biopharmaceutical company and its former employee. I will merely highlight the issues addressed in this case because the

 In re Nat’l City Corp. S’holders Litig., No. 4123-CC (Del. Ch. June 5, 2009), read decision here.

 In this short letter decision, the Chancellor discusses the public policy reasons behind Chancery Court Rule 5(g) which deals with those situations when a document filed with the court may be placed “under seal.” This letter decision involved

Holley Enterprises, Inc. v. The City of Wilmington, No. 4619-VCS (Del. Ch. June 5, 2009), read letter decision here.

This short Chancery Court letter decision provides a useful summary of the standard that must be satisfied before a temporary restraining order is granted–an important instrument to have in the toolbox of the those who handle business litigation

Duthie v. CorSolutions Medical, Inc., et al., No. 3048-VCN (Del. Ch., June 16, 2009), read opinion here.  A prior Chancery Court decision in this advancement case, which also provides more background facts,  has been summarized on this blog here.
 

Overview

This Chancery Court decision discusses in detail the conceptual and public policy basis for an important aspect

Gatz v. Ponsoldt, No. 174-CC (Del. Ch., June 12, 2009), read revised opinion here.

Prior decisions in this case by the Delaware Supreme Court and Chancery Court were summarized here and here on this blog.

Overview

This short letter decision by the Chancery Court approved attorneys’ fees and expenses in the amount of 33% of the settlement

In James Cable, LLC, v. Millennium Digital Media Systems d/b/a “Broadstripe”, et al.,  No. 3637-VCL (June 11, 2009),  read opinion here, Vice Chancellor Lamb was faced with what has become an “all-too-familiar” fact pattern given the state of the economy recently.

Kevin Brady, a highly respected Delaware litigator, provides us with the

Whittington v. Dragon Group, L.L.C., No. 2291-VCP (Del. Ch., June 11, 2009), read opinion here.

Among the several prior decisions of the Chancery Court in this case, the two most recent have been summarized on this blog and are available here.

Overview

This Chancery Court decision is one in a series of Delaware decisions involving a dispute among