Regular readers of these pages may recall multiple prior blog posts on both veil-piercing and reverse veil-piercing over the last 16 years. Serious students should review the book on the topic by the renowned corporate law scholar, and a friend of this blog, Professor Stephen Bainbridge. The Delaware Court of Chancery recently recognized reverse-veil-piercing in
Chancery Court Updates
Chancery Court says transaction timing is everything for derivative suit standing decision
By Francis Pileggi on
Posted in Chancery Court Updates
This post was prepared by Frank Reynolds, who has been following Delaware corporate law, and writing about it for various legal publications, for over 30 years.
The Delaware Court of Chancery recently ruled that SmileDirectClub Inc. investors did not have derivative standing to charge that their stock value was disloyally devalued by their directors’ excessively-priced…
Chancery Addresses Forum Non Conveniens
By Francis Pileggi on
Posted in Chancery Court Updates
For the most recent iteration of Delaware law on the topic of forum non conveniens, as it has evolved over the last few years, careful readers should be aware of the recent Chancery decision in Sweeny v. RPD Holdings Group, LLC, C.A. No. 2020-0813-SG (Del. Ch. May 27, 2021). This decision is consistent with the…
Chancery Provides Instruction on Appraisal Law
By Francis Pileggi on
Posted in Chancery Court Updates
The Delaware Court of Chancery recently provided a nearly book-length tutorial on the law of statutory appraisal in Delaware in a 132-page post-trial decision styled In re Appraisal of Regal Entertainment Group, Cons. C.A. No. 2018-0266-JTL (Del. Ch. May 13, 2021). The court held that the proper price was the deal price, adjusted to eliminate…
Chancery Rejects Argument That Pandemic Caused MAE–Orders Deal to Close
By Francis Pileggi on
Posted in Chancery Court Updates
In the case of Snow Phipps Group LLC v. KCAKE Acquisition, Inc., C.A. No. 2020-0282-KSJM (Del. Ch. April 30, 2021, modified June 2021), the court reviewed a topic of importance in deal litigation and one that has been the subject of many blog posts on these pages: an analysis of when reasonable…
Buyout challenge can’t penetrate MFW business judgment shield, new Chancellor rules
By Francis Pileggi on
Posted in Chancery Court Updates
This post was prepared by Frank Reynolds, who has been following Delaware corporate law, and writing about it for various legal publications, for over 30 years.
Delaware’s Court of Chancery recently threw out an attempt to undermine activist investor Carl Icahn’s claim of business judgment protection under the seminal MFW ruling for his buyout of…
Chancery Provides Guidance on Interpretation of LLC Agreement
By Francis Pileggi on
Posted in Chancery Court Updates
The recent Chancery decision in Pearl City Elevator, Inc. v. Gieseke, C.A. No. 2020-0419-JRS (Del. Ch. March 23, 2021), addressed the issue of whether the procedures in an LLC Agreement were correctly followed, such that a party acquired sufficient ownership interest in order to control the board.
This decision is useful for its recitation of…
Chancery Court says too soon to rule on novel issues in firm’s move to recoup ex-CEO’s advancement
By Francis Pileggi on
Posted in Chancery Court Updates
This post was prepared by Frank Reynolds, who has been following Delaware corporate law, and writing about it for various legal publications, for over 30 years.
The Delaware Chancery Court recently denied as premature Stimwave Technologies Inc.’s motion to recoup $1.2 million in legal fees it had allegedly been tricked into advancing to its ex-CEO …
Chancery Grants Anti-Suit Injunction to Enforce Forum Selection Clause
By Francis Pileggi on
Posted in Chancery Court Updates
A recent decision by a Delaware Court of Chancery provides a useful reference for the prerequisites to obtain an injunction in Delaware to enjoin a party from pursuing claims in violation of an exclusive forum selection clause [in another jurisdiction]. In SPay, Inc. v. Stack Media Inc., C.A. No. 2020-0540-JRS (Del. Ch. March 23…
Self-Sacrifice Not Required of Controlling Stockholder
By Francis Pileggi on
Posted in Chancery Court Updates
A recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision recited important nuances of fiduciary duty applicable to controlling or majority stockholders. In RCS Creditor Trust v. Schorsch, C.A. No. 2017-0178-SG (Del. Ch. March 18, 2021), the court explained that the fiduciary duties of a majority or controlling stockholder do not require self-sacrifice, nor do they mean…