A recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision is noteworthy for its deep dive into the doctrinal underpinnings of the various aspects of fiduciary duties, as well as the difference between the standard of conduct and the standard of review. But my favorite part of the opinion is its discussion of the nuances of duty of
Fifth Edition of the National Law Review’s Delaware Corporate and Commercial Law Monitor
As the Editor-in-Chief of the National Law Review‘s publication called the Delaware Corporate and Commercial Law Monitor, I’m pleased to share the Fifth Edition that has now been published. (My role for this relatively new publication will be in addition to my full-time practice and maintaining this blog–now in it’s 20th
Chancery Addresses Notice Provisions for Redemption Request
A recent Delaware Court of Chancery opinion is useful for its analysis of whether the notice provisions for the exercise a redemption right for warrants was in compliance with the terms of the applicable agreement. In Bruce Kaye as Trustee of the Bruce Kaye Revocable Trust v. Fantasea Resorts Group, Inc., C.A. No.
Chancery Assesses Damages for Unfair Valuation
A recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision is a treasure trove of fundamental principles applicable to corporate litigation. In Ban v. Manheim, C.A. No.2022-0768-JTL (Del. Ch. May 19, 2025), the 60-plus page post-trial opinion applies an exemplary legal analysis to a complex web of entities controlled by one person, to explain why the valuation
Recent Ethics Column on Spoliation of Evidence
For my most recent ethics column for The Bencher, now in its 25th year, I highlighted a recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision on the duty of anyone involved in potential or pending litigation to preserve relevant evidence, including electronic data such as emails and text messages, in order to avoid penalties for spoliation.
Chancery Rules: insider profit, inside info, not always insider trading
Frank Reynolds, who has been covering Delaware corporate decisions for various national publications for over 40 years, prepared this article.
The Delaware Court of Chancery recently dismissed a shareholder suit that claimed Palantir Technologies officers and directors reaped exorbitant profits by using insider trading and deceptive disclosures to sell their stock in the analytic software
Chancery Denies Motion to Strike Part of Pleading
A recent Delaware Chancery decision is notably for its pithy resolution regarding a rarely used but important procedural rule that, in theory, has wide application. In ZAGG v. Keogh, C.A. No. 2023-1275-KSJM (Del. Ch. May 8, 2025), the court denied a motion to strike portions of a pleading based on Rule 12(f) which provides
Chancery Allows SJ Motion on Director Independence Issue
A recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision might carry more impact than its short length might otherwise suggest. In the matter styled In Re Fox Corporation Derivative Litigation, C.A. No. 2023-0419-BWD (Del. Ch. April 28, 2025), the court determined that the defendants could engage in limited discovery in order to file a motion for summary
Recent Chancery Decision Rejects Appraisal Action Filed to Seek Books and Records
A recent Chancery decision with a somewhat quirky procedural context is notable for its analysis of a Section 262 appraisal suit as being an inappropriate vehicle to seek books and records discovery. In Barkan v. Exabean, Inc., C.A. No. 2024-0855-MTZ (Del. Ch. April 11, 2025), the Court of Chancery was presented with a
Chancery Rejects ‘Controlling Mindset’ for Demand Futility Argument
In a recent Chancery decision involving challenges to executive compensation, Eckert v. Hightower, C.A. No. 2024-0569-MTZ (Del. Ch. March 24, 2025), the court reiterates the basic standards that determine if allegations can survive a motion to dismiss when the charter includes an exculpatory clause which requires that a majority of directors have demonstrated a