For my most recent ethics column for The Bencher, now in its 25th year, I highlighted a recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision on the duty of anyone involved in potential or pending litigation to preserve relevant evidence, including electronic data such as emails and text messages, in order to avoid penalties for spoliation.
Commentary
More Scholarship on SB 21
The fusillade of learned commentary on recent developments in Delaware corporate law, known colloquially as SB 21, continues apace. The Delaware Legislature passed legislation in March that statutorily defines controlling shareholder and director independence, via an amendment to DGCL Section 144. It also imposes additional prerequisites in order for a shareholder to demand corporate books…
Third Edition of National Law Review’s Delaware Corporate and Commercial Law Monitor
Recently I was asked to be the Editor-in-Chief of the National Law Review‘s new publication called Delaware Corporate and Commercial Law Monitor. (This role will be in addition to my full-time practice and maintaining this blog, as well as upholding my rich family life and participation in various religious, cultural, professional and community…
Big Change to Delaware Corporate Statute
The Delaware Governor signed legislation last night that makes big changes to Delaware corporate law. The new law amended the corporate statute to create a definition for “controlling shareholder” and “disinterested director” as well as adding new prerequisites before a shareholder can demand corporate records. As the editor of The National Law Review’s Delaware Corporate …
Updates on SB 21 from Tulane Corporate Law Seminar
A PowerPoint with highlights of SB 21 at today’s beginning of the annual Tulane Corporate Law Institute, an event featured many times on these pages in prior years, was part of a panel presentation led William Lafferty of Morris Nichols. For the few people who have missed the tsunami of articles and commentary…
What Those Outside Delaware Say About SB 21
I recently attended a seminar in New York on D&O litigation developments called the PLUS Symposium. The topics lean towards the concerns of those who defend D&O cases and provide D&O coverage.
I listened to a panel entitled: “Hot Topics in D&O 2025”. None of the panel members were Delaware lawyers or members of…
UPDATE on Proposed Amendments to DGCL Section 220–Right to Seek Corporate Books and Records
In the few days since the Delaware Legislature proposed Senate Bill 21 to make major changes to Delaware corporate law, there has been a veritable avalanche of commentary by the professoriate, practitioners, and journalists with their predictions of the consequences of SB 21 being enacted into law. See, e.g., article on The CLS Blue …
New Extension of Blog: National Law Review’s Delaware Corporate and Commercial Law Monitor
For the last 20 years, I have highlighted selected decisions from the Delaware Supreme Court and the Delaware Court of Chancery on these pages, as well as related topics, including legal ethics. Recently, the National Law Review, a publication that is over 100 years old and boasts over 2 million readers, asked me to…
Compliance with Delaware Discovery Rules in Commercial Litigation
Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery and Professor Elise Bernlohr Maizel recently published a law review article entitled Discovery as a Compliance Problem, available at this hyperlink, 50 J. Corp. L. 53 (2024), which should be read by all lawyers involved in commercial litigation in Delaware.
Highlights include…
Corporate Law Scholarship
Several recent articles by corporate law scholars and a jurist (who also deserves to be called a scholar) are worth highlighting. Professor Stephen Bainbridge, often cited in Delaware court decisions and a friend of this blog, and Vice Chancellor Travis Laster, have authored recent articles that should be of interest to those who follow Delaware…