August 2011

On August 11, 2011, the Delaware Supreme Court en banc, in IAC/Interactivecorp. v. O’Brien, No. 629, 2010, affirmed a decision of the Court of Chancery on an issue that goes to the very core of one of the Court of Chancery’s equitable defenses — laches.  While the issue that the Supreme Court addressed seemed

Please join me in a warm welcome to the blogosphere for a new blog that is designed to cater to Delaware lawyers and judges. The recently launched Delaware Trial Practice Forum Blog was advertised as follows in an email sent today to all members of the Delaware Bar:

The purpose of the site is to

Sagarra Inversiones, S.L. v. Cementos Portland Valderrivas, S.A., No. 6179-VCN (Del. Ch. Aug. 5, 2011), read opinion here.  Highlights of a prior Chancery decision in this case were posted here.

The prior Chancery decision in this case refused to grant expedited injunctive relief in connection with installment payments for the purchase of a cement

In Re: Ness Technologies, Inc., Shareholders Litigation, C.A. No. 6569-VCN (Del. Ch. Aug. 3, 2011).

Brief Background

This letter ruling addressed a motion to expedite proceedings in a putative class action that was filed to enjoin a proposed transaction through which the largest shareholder of Ness would, through a wholly owned subsidiary, acquire Ness in

In Roseton OL, LLC v. Dynegy Holdings, Inc., No. 401-2011 (Del. Supr. Aug. 5, 2011), the Delaware Supreme Court today denied an interlocutory appeal from a decision of the Court of Chancery that refused to grant a TRO to creditors of Dynegy who sought to enjoin a restructuring that would transfer assets, arguably used for