Highlights & Analysis of Key Decisions from Delaware's Supreme Court & Court of Chancery
The Delaware Supreme Court recently affirmed a Chancery decision that was highlighted on these pages, which described the limited scope of a summary proceeding under DGCL Section 225 to determine who properly holds a corporate office.
In Barby v. Young, No. 391-2023 Order (Del. June 11, 2024), the high court described that among…
In a targeted proceeding pursuant to Section 225 of the DGCL with the limited purpose of determining whether members of the board of directors were properly removed, the Delaware Court of Chancery determined that the plaintiff did not establish its burden of proof to challenge the removal of board members. In Barbey v. Cerego, Inc…
16th Annual Review of Key Delaware Corporate and Commercial Decisions
By: Francis G.X. Pileggi and Chauna A. Abner
This is the 16th year that Francis Pileggi has published an annual list of key corporate and commercial decisions of the Delaware Supreme Court and the Delaware Court of Chancery. This list does not attempt to include…
A recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision provides noteworthy rulings on the limited scope of a Section 225 summary proceeding regarding the proper composition of the board of directors, as well as the notice requirements for a written consent in lieu of a stockholders’ meeting pursuant to Section 228 of the Delaware General Corporation Law…
The Delaware Court of Chancery in Kerbawy v. McDonnell, C.A. No. 10769-VCP (Del. Ch. Aug. 18, 2015), addresses whether written consents of stockholders were effective in replacing the board members of the company involved. The case features the interplay between DGCL § 225 and § 228 in this corporate litigation over control of the…
Red Oak Fund, L.P. v. Digirad Corp., C.A. No. 8559-VCN (Del. Ch. Aug. 5, 2013).
Issue Addressed: In the context of a challenge to the election of directors, the Court of Chancery considered claims that the disclosure obligations of the directors were breached.
Short overview: This short letter opinion in the context…
TR Investors, LLC v. Genger, C.A. No. 6697-CS (Del. Ch. Feb. 18, 2013).
Issue addressed: Whether the doctrine of “issue preclusion” prevented the relitigation of issues previously decided, and thus supported the grant of a motion for summary judgment. Short answer: Yes.
Short Overview
This 58-page opinion chronicles the long and tortuous…
T.R. Investors, LLC v. Genger, C.A. No. 3994-CS (Del. Ch. Nov. 9, 2012).
Issue Addressed: Whether a final judgment in this case should be reopened under Chancery Rule 60(b)(6) in order for the prevailing party to present a motion for contempt due to the lack of compliance with the final order by the…
Hockessin Community Center, Inc. v. Swift, C.A. No. 7789-VCL (Del. Ch. Oct. 5, 2012).
This decision is most useful for its treatment of nonstock corporations and de facto directors, although it also features enlightening historical anecdotes about important civil rights struggles in Delaware during the early 1950s.
Delaware does not have a separate statute…
Gentili v. L.O.M. Med. Int’l, Inc., C.A. No. 7600-VCG (Del. Ch. Aug. 17, 2012).
Issue: Whether non-unanimous written consents of shareholders were sufficient to thwart a challenge to the election of directors at an annual meeting?
Short answer: No.
Background:
This is a summary proceeding pursuant to DGCL Section 225 to…