Over the last few years, compared to the last few decades, the trend of courts in many states has been to be less willing to enforce restrictive covenants based on closer scrutiny of nuances such as the legitimate business interest in the scope of the restrictions. This development is consistent with the increasing number of
restrictive covenant
Unreasonable Restrictive Covenants Fail Delaware’s Holistic Review
Rolando Diaz of the Lewis Brisbois Delaware office prepared this post.
The Court of Chancery refused to enforce a restrictive covenant in Sunder Energy, LLC v. Jackson, 2023 Del. Ch. LEXIS 580 (Del. Ch. Nov. 22, 2023). Chancery subsequently approved, with thorough reasoning, an interlocutory appeal to the Supreme Court–which makes its own…
TRO Granted to Enforce Covenant-Not-To-Compete Despite Liquidated Damages Provision
The Delaware Court of Chancery granted a TRO recently to enforce a covenant-not-to-compete, or non-compete agreement, notwithstanding a liquidated damages provision and the (unsuccessful) argument that such a provision created the absence of irreparable harm needed for injunctive relief. In Affinity Wealth Management LLC v. McPoyle, C.A. No. 2019-0441-JTL, transcript (Del. Ch. June 18,…
Court Rules on Exit of Hedge Fund Partner
Seibold v. Camulos Partners LP, C.A. No. 5176-CS (Del. Ch. Sept. 17, 2012).
Issue Addressed: Did hedge fund breach the limited partnership agreement by not distributing to the departing partner his capital investment?
Short Answer: Yes. In addition, the Court addressed many related claims and issues in connection with the departure of …