Buerger v. Apfel, C.A. No. 6539-VCL (Del. Ch. March 15, 2012).

Issue Presented

Whether equitable tolling could save claims that would otherwise be barred by the applicable statute of limitations or latches, which defendants argued should block any challenge to certain stock options and other related-party transactions.

Background

The disputed transactions involve a company

Whittington v. Dragon Group L.L.C., No. 2291-VCP (Feb. 15, 2010), read opinion here.

Previous decisions of the Delaware courts in the long line of cases involving this internecine warfare among family members fighting over their interests in various business entities, have been summarized on this blog and can be found here.

This latest iteration by the

 Dubroff, et al. v. Wren Holdings, LLC, et al., Del. Ch., No. 3940-VCN (May 22, 2009), read opinion here.

Kevin Brady, a highly-respected Delaware litigator, provides us with the benefit of his following review of this Delaware Chancery Court decision.

On May 22, 2009, Vice Chancellor Noble granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion

In General Video Corp. v. Kertesz, et al., 2008 Del Ch. LEXIS 181 (Dec. 17, 2008), read opinion here, the Delaware Chancery Court  addresses in a 76-page decision, issues of practical importance to anyone interested in the sundry dilemmas that always arise in connection with the "break-up" of a closely-held business. As commonly happens, one of the "partners" of