Carsanaro v. Bloodhound Technologies, Inc., C.A. No. 7301-VCP (Del. Ch. March 15, 2013).

This 76-page Chancery decision addresses issues that include the following: (1) when a claim for dilution of minority shares can be pursued directly instead of, or in addition to, derivately; (2) restrictions imposed by DGCL Section 160 on the right to redeem

In the latest installment of the LexisNexis Corporate and Securities Update, Steve Berstler of LexisNexis interviews Francis G.X. Pileggi, Member-in-Charge of Eckert Seamans’ Delaware office, and Kevin F. Brady of Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz, during which they discuss the Delaware Court of Chancery’s opinion in Dubroff v. Wren Holdings LLC, as well as

 Dubroff, et al. v. Wren Holdings, LLC, et al., Del. Ch., No. 3940-VCN (May 22, 2009), read opinion here.

Kevin Brady, a highly-respected Delaware litigator, provides us with the benefit of his following review of this Delaware Chancery Court decision.

On May 22, 2009, Vice Chancellor Noble granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion