The Delaware Court of Chancery granted a TRO recently to enforce a covenant-not-to-compete, or non-compete agreement, notwithstanding a liquidated damages provision and the (unsuccessful) argument that such a provision created the absence of irreparable harm needed for injunctive relief. In Affinity Wealth Management LLC v. McPoyle, C.A. No. 2019-0441-JTL, transcript (Del. Ch. June 18,

In a post-trial decision, the Court of Chancery in Dweck v. Nasser, C. A. No. 1353-VCL (Jan. 18, 2012), found that Dweck, the former CEO, a director and 30% stockholder in Kids International Corporation (“Kids”), and Kevin Taxin, Kids’ President, breached their fiduciary duties of loyalty to Kids by establishing competing companies that usurped

Mobile Diagnostic Group Holdings, LLC v. Suer,  Del. Ch., No. 4298-CC (March 24, 2009), read opinion here.

Kevin Brady, a highly respected Delaware litigator, provides us with the following review of this decision.

Chancellor Chandler dismissed this action seeking to enforce the terms of non-competition covenants that defendant Suer allegedly agreed to in connection with the