As the Editor-in-Chief of the National Law Reviews publication called the Delaware Corporate and Commercial Law Monitor, I’m pleased to share the Fifth Edition that has now been published. (My role for this relatively new publication will be in addition to my full-time practice and maintaining this blog–now in it’s 20th

Frank Reynolds, who has been covering Delaware corporate decisions for various national publications for over 40 years, prepared this article.

The Delaware Supreme Court recently ruled that the Court of Chancery should have revived a derivative suit over a stock sale by a major Kraft Heinz Co. investor after learning the action had been wrongly

Frank Reynolds, who has been covering Delaware corporate decisions for various national publications for over 40 years, prepared this article.

The Delaware Court of Chancery recently dismissed a shareholder suit that claimed Palantir Technologies officers and directors reaped exorbitant profits by using insider trading and deceptive disclosures to sell their stock in the analytic software

The fusillade of learned commentary on recent developments in Delaware corporate law, known colloquially as SB 21, continues apace. The Delaware Legislature passed legislation in March that statutorily defines controlling shareholder and director independence, via an amendment to DGCL Section 144. It also imposes additional prerequisites in order for a shareholder to demand corporate books