The recent decision in the case of In re Aspartame Antitrust Litigation from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No. 2:06-cv-01732-LDD (E.D. Pa. Oct. 5, 2011), read Order here, awarding more than $500,000 for the costs of e-discovery to the prevailing parties in an antitrust litigation matter, should be in
Chancery Describes Limited Costs Included in Rule 54(d) Award
By Francis Pileggi on
Posted in Chancery Court Updates
In Tanyous v. Happy Child World, Inc., (Del Ch., Dec. 19, 2008), the Chancery Court described the very limited scope of "costs" included under Rule 54(g) to the victor after trial. For example, "costs", as that term is defined by the court, in this context does not cover deposition transcripts or trial transcripts, nor…