In the recent decision styled as: In The Matter of Krafft-Murphy Co., Inc., CA No. 6049-VCP (Del. Ch. Nov. 9, 2011), read opinion here, the Court addressed the unusual and novel issue of whether a receiver can be appointed under 8 Del. C. § 279 for a dissolved insulation company for claimants who suffered

Seven Investments, LLC v. AD Capital, LLC, C.A. No. 6449-VCL (Del. Ch. Nov. 21, 2011), read opinion here.

Issue Addressed: Whether a release agreement previously signed among the parties served to preclude the claims presented in this case.

Short Answer: Yes

Very Short Overview
This relatively concise decision of the Court of

In Espinoza v. Hewlett-Packard Co., read opinion here, the Delaware Supreme Court yesterday affirmed the Court of Chancery’s denial of a request under DGCL Section 220 for a report regarding the investigation relating to the ouster of former Hewlett Packard CEO Mark Hurd. Highlights of prior Chancery decisions in this matter are available here.

SV Investment Partners, LLC v. ThoughtWorks, Inc., No. 107, 2011 (Del. Supr., Nov. 15, 2011), read Delaware Supreme Court opinion here.

Issue Addressed

Whether SV Investments failed to carry its burden of proof that “legally available funds” were available to redeem its preferred shares.

Short Answer

The judgment of the Court of Chancery determining

The Conglomerate blog is generating a group of posts by various law professors who are singing the praises of former Chancellor William Chandler and his contributions to corporate law during his recently completed tenure on the Delaware Court of Chancery. For example, Matt Brodie discusses here how the former Chancellor in his Airgas decision cites

In Winshall v. Viacom Int’l., C. A. No. 6074-CS (Del. Ch., Nov. 10, 2011), read opinion here, the Delaware Court of Chancery granted a motion to dismiss a claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in a dispute over post-merger earn-out payments. What is also of note for