A recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision is notable for addressing the nuances of an analysis about whether a Certificate of Cancellation for an LLC should be nullified, in a post-trial opinion styled: In re Reinz Wisconsin Gasket, LLC, C.A. No. 2022-0859-MTZ (Del. Ch. April 2, 2026).
Background
The background of this case includes
The recent Chancery decision in Calumet Capital Partners LLC v. Victory Park Capital Advisors, LLC, C.A. No. 2025-0036-JTL (Del. Ch. Jan. 29, 2026), addressed various issues in a motion to dismiss claims involving poaching of employees and disloyalty among business partners.
Although there is much to commend this 74-page decision, I will limit my
The Delaware Supreme Court’s recent decision addressing the nuances and subtleties of a claim for aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty is must reading for corporate and commercial litigators. In the matter styled: In re Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. Merger Litigation, Del. Supr., No. 281-2024 (June 17, 2025), the en banc high
My 7th Edition as Editor-in-Chief of the Delaware Corporate and Commercial Law Monitor published by The National Review is now available.
We collect articles from around the country, by practitioners and academics, about the latest developments on the titular topic.
Aimee Czachorowski, an attorney in the Delaware office of Lewis Brisbois, prepared this post.
The Delaware Supreme Court, in In re Mindbody, Inc. Stockholder Litigation, C.A. No. 2019-0442 (Del. Supr. Dec. 2, 2024), affirmed the Court of Chancery’s finding that Mindbody’s founder and CEO had breached fiduciary duties in connection with actions he took
Ross Holding and Management Company v. Advance Realty Group, LLC, C.A. No. 4113-VCN (Del. Ch. Feb. 28, 2013; revised on March 7, 2013).
What This Case is About: This case involved allegations that managers of an LLC breached their fiduciary duty in connection with a restructuring that adversely impacted the value of the
Dubroff v. Wren Holdings, LLC, C.A. No. 3940-VCN (Del. Ch. Oct. 28, 2011), read 45-page opinion here. See prior Chancery decisions in this case highlighted on these pages here and here.
Issues Addressed
The issues addressed in this gem of an opinion include: (i) whether and when a minority shareholder’s claim for breach