Conrad v. Blank, 2007 WL 2593540 (Del.Ch., Sept. 7, 2007), read opinion here. This Chancery Court decision allowed a stock option backdating claim to proceed and denied a Motion to Dismiss that alleged failure to make a pre-suit demand. The opinion included a complete overview of the analysis applicable when pre-suit demand must be made as a prerequisite
Court of Chancery Updates
Preview of Future Chancery Court Decision
This weekend’s edition of The Wall Street Journal has an article here about the ongoing Chancery Court litigation between two partners in the successful private equity firm of Fox Paine & Co., who had a falling out. The article details the high-stakes, bitter partnership dispute involving large sums of money that is the type of case…
Discovery in Section 220 Case Compelled and Public Policy Against “Purchase of Grievances” Addressed
Melzer v. CNET Networks, Inc., 2007 WL 2593065 (Del. Ch., Sept. 6, 2007), read opinion here. This is a Chancery Court decision addressing a discovery dispute in the context of 8 Del. C. Section 220. Many cases interpreting DGCL Section 220, regarding a shareholder’s right to demand books and records, have been summarized on…
Court Rules on Validity of Signature on Agreement
In Swinford v. World Aviation Systems, Inc. (Del.Ch., Aug. 29, 2007), read opinion here, the Chancery Court dealt with the attempted enforcement by an ex-employer of an agreement with an ex-employee to arbitrate disputes. The ex-employee refused to admit that the signature on the document was his. Instead, he claimed that his signature was forged. In light…
Attorneys’ Fees Granted in Class Action Settlement
In Franklin Balance Sheet Investment Fund v. Crowley, 2002 WL 2495018 (Del. Ch., Aug. 30, 2007), read opinion here, the Chancery Court awarded fees in connection with the settlement of a class action suit that alleged breach of fiduciary duty and waste in connection with life insurance policies obtained for the controlling shareholder.…
Acquiring Company Must Pay Ex-Shareholders for Breaching Earnout Provision of Contract
In LaPoint v. AmerisourceBergen Corp., (Del. Ch., Sept. 4, 2007), read opinion here, the Chancery Court ruled that a merger agreement was breached in connection with an "earnout provision", and awarded former shareholders of the acquired company $21 million in damages. Amerisource has vowed to appeal, as reported by Bloomberg News here. The…
Chancery Rules on Lives of the Rich and Famous–Denies Creditor’s Motion to Intervene
In The Follieri Group LLC v . Follieri/Yucaipa Investments, LLC, 2007 WL 2459226 (Del. Ch., Aug. 23, 2007), read opinion here, the Chancery Court decided a preliminary issue in a business dispute involving a joint venture entered into by the rich and famous. The Court denied the effort of a putative creditor (of the LLC sought to…
Chancery Refuses Interlocutory Appeal of Order Granting Limited Discovery Pending Rule 23.1 Motion
In Fleischman v. Huang, 2007 WL 2410386 (Del. Ch., Aug. 22, 2007), read opinion here, the Chancery Court, in quite forceful terms, refused to certify an interlocutory appeal of a discovery order, reasoning that the requirements of Supreme Court Rule 42 were not met. The Court further denied a motion to stay the order…
Chancery Rejects Both Parties’ Experts; Reaches Appraisal Valuation Independently
In Highfields Capital, Ltd. v. AXA Financial, Inc., 2007 WL 2410295 (Del. Ch., Aug. 17, 2007), read opinion here, the Chancery Court rejected the expert testimony of the experts of both parties and arrived independently at its own valuation in this appraisal proceedings pursuant to Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (Title…
Rule 408 Does Not Bar Inclusion To Show Awareness of Facts
In Baldwin v. Carmack, 2007 WL 2410377 (Del. Ch., Aug. 17, 2007), read opinion here, the Chancery Court, in connection with a motion for partial summary judgment, in a one-page letter ruling refused a request for the court to strike a portion of a brief based on the argument that the brief included inadmissible settlement discussions contrary to…