The Court of Chancery recently explained the public policy reasons for enforcing discovery rules and scheduling deadlines, as well as explaining the types of penalties available for failure to comply with discovery obligations or deadlines.
The key takeaways from the decision in Terramar Retail Centers, LLC v. Marion #2-Seaport Trust U/A/D June 21, 2002, C.A. No. 12875-VCL (Del. Ch. Dec. 4, 2018), include the following:
- The court explains the policy reasons for the need to enforce the rules of discovery and scheduling deadlines. See pages 19 to 20.
- The court describes the types of penalties that are available for the court to impose for a party’s failure to comply with discovery rules or deadlines. See pages 21 to 25. See generally, Rule 37(b)(2).
- The court explained that Delaware courts generally will strictly adhere to discovery deadlines. See footnote 48.
There are multiple Delaware decisions highlighted on these pages regarding the topic addressed in this decision. See, e.g., here and here.