N.K.S. Distributors, Inc. v. Tigani, C.A. No. 4640-VCP (Del. Ch. June 7, 2010), read letter decision here. Read highlights of prior Chancery decisions in this case here.
This letter decision is notable for its recitation of the familiar prerequisites of both a TRO and a preliminary injunction, but more practically, it provides a helpful comparison of the somewhat nuanced differences between the prerequisites that need to be satisfied for one seeking a TRO compared with the requirements that must be met before the Court will grant a motion for a preliminary injunction. See footnotes 6 and 14 through 17. There are other aspects of this factually rich decision that may be entertaining but do not have much legal importance for purposes of this blog.