Sprint Nextel Corp. v. iPCS, Inc., 2008 WL 2737409 (Del. Ch., July 14, 2008), read opinion here.
The issue addressed in this Chancery Court case (which was the subject of three prior opinions and a ten day trial on related issues), was presented on a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction as to two of the defendants based on Chancery Court Rule 12(b)(2) and for failure to state a claim under Chancery Court Rule 12(b)(6) as well as a motion to dismiss or stay the action pending a parallel suit brought by three affiliated defendants in Illinois.
The court found that it did lack personal jurisdiction over defendants Horizon and Bright but it denied a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. On the third issue, the court denied the motion to dismiss or stay the action on forum non conveniens grounds. See here for summaries of prior related decisions.