Two recent Chancery Court decisions addressed the issues of forum non conveniens and determination of proper directors pursuant to Section 225 of the DGCL. As explained in prior posts, these will be short references to the main issues in the cases.
In Kurtin v. KRE, LLC, et al., Vice Chancellor Parsons stayed a Delaware case in favor of a first-filed suit in California involving similar parties and issues.
In Nevins v. Bryan, et al., the court engaged in an extensive analysis to determine that a challenge to the membership of the board of a non-profit corporation was not successful, based on the detailed factual analysis engaged in. Both decisions are available at the court’s website.