January 2011

King v.VeriFone Holdings, Inc., Del. Supr., No. 330, 2010 (Jan. 28, 2011), read opinion here, is a Delaware Supreme Court decision that provides added clarity to practitioners regarding the "proper purpose" and related prerequisites that a shareholder must satisfy in order to successfully seek books and records under DGCL Section 220. This ruling reversed a Chancery

On January 24, 2011, the Court of Chancery in Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. Airgas, Inc., et al. C. A. No. 5249-CC,  issued a written decision explaining its January 21, 2011 oral ruling denying Airgas’s motion to exclude the testimony of Air Products’ expert witness, Joseph J. Morrow, at the supplemental evidentiary hearing. Read

U.S. v. Florida, (N.D. Fl., Jan. 31, 2011), read opinion here. Though this decision may appear far afield from the usual business litigation fare of this blog, because this federal decision declaring unconstitutional the federal health care law passed last year is of such far-reaching impact on businesses (and individuals), and because it has some

Professor Larry Ribstein has added to his extensive scholarship on jurisdictional competition, in which Delaware’s role is prominently featured, with an article linked as part of his descriptive post here. The abstract follows:

Most of the work on jurisdictional competition for business associations has focused on publicly held corporations and the factors that have led

Depositions in Delaware are subject to rules of practice and procedure that are materially different in form and substance to what I have observed in many other states. Both the Delaware Chancery Court and the Delaware Supreme Court enforce the rules relating to deposition practice and take it very seriously.

In a seminar last week,

Great-West Investors LP v. Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P., C.A. No. 5508-VCN (Del. Ch. Jan. 14, 2011), read opinion here.

Issue Addressed

This 37-page decision from the Delaware Court of Chancery addresses multiple contract interpretation issues between two sophisticated parties. The most memorable issue addressed in the decision – – and one that’s less commonly

Microstrategy, Inc. v. Acacia Research Corp., C.A. No. 5735-VCP (Del. Ch. Dec. 30, 2010).

Issues Addressed

This 52-page decision by the Delaware Court of Chancery addressed competing claims regarding breach of a Settlement Agreement. The Court granted in part and denied in part Motions to Dismiss. In particular, the Court dismissed the breach of