May 2010

M3 Healthcare Solutions v. Family Practice Associates, P.A., No. 691-2009 (Del. Supr. May 28, 2010), read opinion here. The specific issue decided in this case is whether an arbitration award should be modified, vacated or corrected. The Supreme Court determined that the arbitration award should not be modified, and thus affirmed the judgment of the Court

In Concord Real Estate CDO 2006-1, Ltd. v. Bank of America N.A., C.A. No. 5219-VCL (Del. Ch. May 14, 2010), read opinion here, the Court of Chancery addressed the issue of whether notes issued as part of a collateralized debt obligation were discharged when the holder surrendered them voluntarily to the obligors with the intent that

Brown Investment Management, L.P. v. Parkcentral Global, L.P., C.A. No. 5248-VCL (May 24, 2010), read letter decision here. This short ruling by letter followed a decision from the bench after a one-day trial in which a limited partner sought the names and addresses of fellow limited partners of a defunct hedge fund. The Court’s letter explains

Aris Multi-Strategy Fund, LP v. Southridge Partners LP, C.A. No. 5422-CC (Del. Ch. May 21, 2010), read letter decision here. Although barely three-pages long, this ruling is noteworthy for the important issue that it decides.

This matter was presented to the Court of Chancery on a motion to dismiss a suit that demanded books and records of a