In the recent case of Tafeen v. Homestore, Inc., Chancellor Chandler reviewed the decision of a Special Master involving the determination of the reasonableness of the amount of a request for the advancement of attorneys’ fees in an indemnification and advancement case. In prior decisions the court provided a detailed recitation of the facts and the court also determined that Homestore had not raised valid defenses to the advancement of Tafeen’s fees, who was entitled to have his reasonable fees advanced pursuant to his indemnification contract. The court, with one exception, approved the final report of the Master regarding the reasonableness of the fees sought to be advanced. The reasonableness was based on Rule 1.5(a) of the Delaware Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct.