May 2013

In Re MFW Shareholder Litigation, C.A. No. 6566-CS (Del. Ch. May 29, 2013).

Issue Addressed: What standard of review should apply to a going-private merger conditioned upfront by the controlling stockholder on approval by both a properly empowered, independent committee and an informed, uncoerced majority-of-the-minority vote.

Short Answer: When a controlling stockholder

National Industries Group (Holding) v. Carlyle  Investment Management LLC, Del. Supr., No. 596, 2012 (May 29, 2013).

Issues Addressed: Enforceability of a forum selection clause, and the prerequisites to vacate a judgment under Court of Chancery Rule 60(b)(6).

Brief Background

This case involved a dispute between two sophisticated entities. One was based in Kuwait

Norton v. K-Sea Transportation Partners, L.P., Del. Supr., No. 238, 2012 (May 28, 2013). This Delaware Supreme Court decision is the second in consecutive business days that addresses the concept of good faith in the contractual context. See SIGA Technologies, Inc. v. PharmAthene, Inc., highlighted on these pages. (Photo: Supreme Court Building in

Anvil Holding Corp. v. Iron Acquisition Co., C.A. No. 7975-VCP (May 17, 2013).

Issue:  Motion to dismiss a complaint for fraud and bad faith breach of contract in a dispute for the sale of securities.

Answer:  Denied as to the fraud claim and granted as to bad faith breach of contract claim.

Background

This

SIGA Technologies, Inc. v. PharmAthene, Inc., Del. Supr., No. 314, 2012 (May 24, 2013). This Delaware Supreme Court decision was the subject of a BloombergBusinessweek article on Sunday, May 26. The Court of Chancery’s opinion was highlighted on these pages at this link. Also, several other prior Chancery decisions in this case were also

In Re China Agritech, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation, C.A. No. 7163-VCL (Del. Ch. May 21, 2013).

Issue Addressed:  Whether a complaint that fails to plead that demand was made on the Board and fails to plead demand futility should be dismissed under Rules 23.1 or 12(b)(6).

Short Answer:  No.  Motions to dismiss

Senior Housing Capital, LLC v. SHP Senior Housing Fund LLC, C.A. No. 4586-CS (Del. Ch. May 13, 2013)

Issue Addressed: Whether judicial review is permitted on an appraisal that followed a process required by an LLC agreement which contained no mechanism for substantive judicial review of the appraisal?

Short Answer:  No, the Court

In re: Primedia, Inc., Shareholders Litigation, Cons., C.A. No. 6511-VCL (Del. Ch. May 10, 2013).

Issue Addressed:  Whether insider trading claim based on state law should be allowed to proceed despite motion to dismiss by special litigation committee.
Short Answer:  Motion to dismiss denied.

Brief Background

Details of this case were previously