Poison Puts and Delaware Corporate Law

Prof. Steven Davidoff as The Deal Professor on the DealBook blog, here, writes about pending battles for control over the pharmaceutical company, Amylin, including efforts by Carl Icahn and others to nominate new directors, as well as a pending suit in Delaware Chancery Court by a pension fund against Amylin. The good professor also discusses what are referred to as "poison put" provisions that would trigger repayment of debt upon certain changes in control or board composition, as well as whether such triggers would run afoul of the Delaware Supreme Court's decision in Unocal and DGCL Section 141(a).

Trackbacks (4) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.delawarelitigation.com/admin/trackback/126193
Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog - May 4, 2009 2:12 PM
San Antonio Fire and Police Pension Fund v. Bradbury is a case that is being tried today in Delaware Chancery Court regarding "poison puts" involving the Amylin company. We previously highlighted the case here. The folks at Courtroom View Net...
Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog - May 4, 2009 3:06 PM
San Antonio Fire and Police Pension Fund v. Bradbury is a case that is being tried today in Delaware
Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog - May 15, 2009 5:16 PM
San Antonio Fire & Police Pension Fund v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. 4446-VCL (Del.Ch., May 12, 2009), read opinion here. This Chancery Court decision addressed the issue of "poison puts" or a provision in an indenture that would h...
Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog - May 15, 2009 5:25 PM
San Antonio Fire & Police Pension Fund v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc ., No. 4446-VCL (Del.Ch., May
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.