February 2009

Thornton, et al. v. Bernard Technologies, Inc., (Del. Ch., C.A. No. 962-VCN, February 20, 2009), read opinion here.

Kevin Brady, a highly respected Delaware litigator,  prepared the following review of this case.

In this Chancery Court decision, Vice Chancellor Noble granted defendants’ motion to dismiss a direct and derivative action brought in December 2004

August v. August, (Del. Ch., C.A. No. 3180-VCS, February 20, 2009).

Kevin Brady, a highly respected Delaware litigator,  prepared the following review of the case.

In a bankruptcy and creditors’ rights case with a fact pattern that is more likely to resemble an episode of “CSI” or “24,” Vice Chancellor Strine, in a 37-page post-trial opinion

In Lillis v. AT & T Corp., (Del. Ch., Feb. 25,  2009), read letter decision here,  the Chancery Court reviewed a dispute about the reasonableness of fees that were awarded in an advancement claim as well as related litigation. There have been several Delaware opinions involving these parties in this long running case, which have been highlighted

In Re Citigroup Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation, (Del. Ch., Feb. 24, 2009), read opinion here.

This Delaware Chancery Court opinion should be of widespread interest because it is the first detailed analysis of potential liability of directors under Delaware law for claims relating to a company suffering major losses resulting from substantial exposure

The Delaware Chancery Court, by Order available here, has amended Chancery Court Rules 3(aa) and 15(c), effective March 2, 2009. The text of the Order is so short, I will repeat it verbatim:

This 31st  day of December, 2008, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court of Chancery Rule 3(aa) is amended by deleting the