Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal As Penalty for Failure to Comply with Discovery

In Hoag v. Amex Insurance Company, (Del. Supr., July 21, 2008), read opinion here, the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the trial court's imposition of the penalty of dismissal of a complaint against a plaintiff that failed repeatedly to comply with orders compelling discovery of data that was key to the claims and defenses in the case. The Court recited in detail the multiple orders that the appellant simply failed to comply with depsite ample opportunity.

Delaware's High Court acknowledged the severity of the penalty but reasoned that it  was warranted in light of the circumstances. The opinion includes "good quotable" language about the importance to the legal system of compliance with discovery obligations.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.delawarelitigation.com/admin/trackback/81112
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.