Stay Denied In DGCL 220 Case Pending Appeal

In Wynnefield Partners Cap Value L.P. v. Niagara Corporation, read opinion here, the Chancery Court decided a motion for a stay pending an appeal of a prior decision summarized here,  which granted a demand for documents under Section 220 of the DGCL.  The movant argued that the appeal would be moot unless a stay was granted pending the appeal.  The Motion for Stay was denied with the only exception that the court required a Confidentiality Agreement “for attorneys’ eyes only” be put in place pending the appeal.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.delawarelitigation.com/admin/trackback/23937
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.