Discovery Oversight Exposed Counsel to Deposition

In LaPoint v. AmerisourceBergen Corp, , the Chancery Court gave the defendant two options to having its lead counsel deposed in light of the failure of the lead counsel to confirm that 416 boxes of documents that were responsive to discovery requests were no longer in the possession of the defendant entity but were likely to be responsive to prior document requests. While a subsidiary was in control of the defendant, counsel conveyed the message in reply to discovery that boxes in a warehouse had been searched. After the subsidiary was sold, it was determined that the boxes were not searched and counsel was the only one subject to subpoena who had knowledge about their relevance. If the options offered were not chosen, defense counsel was required to be deposed.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.delawarelitigation.com/admin/trackback/23762
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.